Software for the finest computer – The Mind

  • Tim’s YouTube Channel

  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,005 other followers

  • Categories

  • Fan Page

  • Since 1971:
    "Software for the finest computer - The Mind"

    Follow me on Twitter: @timbryce

  • Subscribe


Posted by Tim Bryce on December 4, 2013


– Career criminals are slipping through the cracks.

To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

I haven’t been sleeping well lately, and I suspect I’m not alone. We need to believe we are safe in our homes, that law enforcement personnel are patrolling our streets, and the bad guys are being locked up behind bars. Unfortunately, this is not always true as career criminals with long rap sheets are being released rather than incarcerated. Let me explain.

Even though crime rates are declining, there has been a significant increase in jail populations over the years. Not surprising, the cost to imprison suspects in county lockups have skyrocketed, including here in Pinellas County. Reports place it at $126 per prisoner per day. If all arrests resulted in a stay in the county jail, even if it was for just one night, the sheriff would quickly exceed his budget. Consequently, there is an effort to pre-release suspects with lighter offenses. US Attorney General Eric Holder recently announced the start of a new program allowing people arrested for minor drug offenses to be released as opposed to being locked up in jail. This means more and more people are being released under their own recognizance, referred to as “ROR” in the justice system.

The supposition is there is no need to incarcerate people arrested on low-level, nonviolent offenses who are not considered flight risks. Aside from the most serious crimes, such as first-degree murder, bail is set in most cases and intended more as a guarantee the accused will show up for court. However, many poor people arrested for minor crimes cannot afford bail. In addition, the pre-release program is considered a more humane way of treating people, particularly indigents who may have family members depending on them.

This may reduce jail costs and help balance budgets, but there are side effects. The system is certainly not perfect. To illustrate, ROR suspects may decide not to return for trial, thereby costing taxpayers money to reschedule court appearances. They may also flee the county completely, again costing taxpayers to pay for their return. More troubling though is if they are released and cause more mayhem in the community, and herein is where I have trouble sleeping. According to a report by the Florida Legislature OPPAGA (Dec 2012, No. 12-13) on the Pretrial Release Program in 2011, 144 warrants were issued for ROR people failing to appear in court (5.9% of the study), and 160 ROR people were arrested for committing another offense while released (6.6%), for a total of 304 misfits.

Those people who have bonded out of jail, instead of ROR, are more likely to make their court appearances and behave for two reasons; first, the financial incentive to do so, and; second, bail bondsmen are good judges of character. They will not issue a bond to someone they feel are a risk and will not live up to their commitment. The bail bondsmen also keep an eye on their people, something the police do not have time or resources to do.

What concerns me is the criteria by which people are released on their own recognizance, especially if they have a history of prior offenses. I have recently been reviewing Subject Charge Reports from the Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office which details the history of individual arrests. Such reports are available through the sheriff’s web site, ““. For example, one suspect from Treasure Island was arrested for violation of the pretrial release (failure to appear, a misdemeanor). His prior arrests included domestic battery (multiple), DUI, and other minor offenses. Even though he was released under his own recognizance, he was arrested three days later for violation of pretrial release (again).

In another report, a Largo man was picked up for resisting arrest without violence and was ROR by a judge. The suspect’s rap sheet included grand theft auto, reckless driving, possession of just about every illegal narcotic you can imagine, loitering and prowling, driving while license under suspension, and several moving offenses. Yet another report involves a St. Petersburg man picked up for possession of cocaine. His priors include multiple counts of burglary, theft, criminal mischief, and other drug offenses. This is just a handful of examples. I saw dozens more.

I might understand seeing a person released with one or two misdemeanors, but those mentioned here are career criminals with a litany of felonies as well as misdemeanors. By releasing them early, we may be saving a few bucks but, more likely, we are putting the public safety at risk. Case in point, the Melissa Danielle Dohme incident in 2012 where her ex-boyfriend from High School was arrested for battery, only to be ROR where he attacked and stabbed her multiple times. Although the attack was brutal, Melissa somehow miraculously survived. The story highlights the flaws in the pretrial release system.

In 2010, the “Florida Pretrial Misconduct Risk Assessment Instrument” was published which reported on the effect of the pretrial release programs of six Florida counties, including Pinellas. The report concluded by stating the average success rate for the six counties was 87%, meaning the defendants returned for their court appearances and didn’t cause any additional problems. Statistically, 87% sounds somewhat successful, but when you consider Pinellas had 3,361 defendants released as part of the program in 2010, this means 436 failed the program. 436 potential time-bombs in our community.

So the question becomes, are these career criminals statistical anomalies or can we do a better job of preventing them from causing more problems. I would like to believe we can do better, beginning with a standard and consistent approach for evaluating prisoners based on industry standards. I would also like to see our judges, who issue the RORs, operate in a consistent and predictable manner. I also believe bail bondsmen can play a more active role, particularly in the screening process of career criminals.

Tightening up the system with some simple, common sense methods, would do a world of good for the system. It would take a harder look at career criminals, reduce the number of problems slipping through the cracks, thereby allowing us to sleep a little sounder at night.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at

For Tim’s columns, see:

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2013 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

NEXT UP:  THE INVASION OF THE MAINTENANCE WORKERS – Does your neighborhood turn into a factory during the day? Mine does.

LAST TIME:  MANAGING COMPLEXITY – Are we juggling too many balls?

Listen to Tim on WJTN-AM (News Talk 1240) “The Town Square” with host John Siggins (Mon, Wed, Fri, 12:30-3:00pm Eastern), KGAB-AM 650 “The Morning Zone” with host Dave Chaffin (weekdays, 6:00-10:00am Mountain), and KIT-AM 1280 in Yakima, Washington “The Morning News” with hosts Lance Tormey & Brian Teegarden (weekdays. 6:00-9:00am Pacific). Or tune-in to Tim’s channel on YouTube.


  1. David said

    After 20+ years working in the criminal justice arena, including five years in the our county jails, I can only assume you are not aware of the reality on the ground when it comes to bail bondsmen. You say they are better at judging defendant? Why then do I see defendant after defendant failing to appear while on bond, or being arrested on new offenses while out on bond? I have never seen a bondsman de cline to accept money from a family member and leave a defendant incustody. The only criteria they evaluate is whether the check will clear….

    You site two cases of defendants who commited new offenses while out on “ROR”. Did you look into the number of offenses alleged from those on bond? It happens every day. Search the internet on the killing of four law enforcment officers in Washington state by a defendant who was out on bond, turned out he was actually out on more than one and did not even have to pay the industry standard 10%. Did you know that bondsman around the country are now releasing defendant with 0% down and putting the defendants on payment plans?

    Yes, there are proiblems in our nations jails with over crowding and some answers may come from better law enforcement activity, better rehabiulitation and yes, better pre-trial programs. But I seriously doubt any answers will come from increasing the access a for profit business has to inmates.


  2. Luis Escarra said

    Replied to David,

    It’s obvious you don’t like bondsman’s, better yet you hate them, but the truth is the bondsman’s have been around for many years, bondsman’s don’t cost tax payers money, bondsman’s pay the total bond amount to the clerk of the courts when a defendant fails to appear and can’t not be returned to custody on a timely basis. Bondsman’s failure to appear rate is less than 3% in many counties, so let’s get the facts straight.
    Pretrial release program in my opinion is good and it’s needed for what it was designed for, FOR INDIGENTSSSSSSS! FOR THE POOR, HOMELESS, PEOPLE THAT HAVE A LIMITED INCOME, DRUG OFFENDERS AND OTHERS.
    And again this Pretrial release program is funded by TAX PAYERS, and it is very costly.
    And to finish it, Government should not interfere with the private sector.
    The problem is our judicial system, it needs to be re-evaluated, needs to be tougher, and PROSECUTE CRIMINALS, CAREER CRIMINALS, and stop negotiating programs that are helpless to the criminals.
    So David, next time you write, please get your facts straight, educate yourself.
    Luis Escarra




  4. Tim Bryce said

    An M.T. of Chicago, Illinois wrote…

    “A very timely article; I agree with your opinions.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: