WHY WE NEED A MIDDLE CLASS
Posted by Tim Bryce on August 28, 2015
BRYCE ON POLITICS
– An argument for capitalism.
(Click for AUDIO VERSION)
To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.
Do people truly understand the power of the middle class? I think they’re starting to overseas. We may not have invented the concept of a middle class, but we sure perfected it, and everyone wants to emulate it. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, countries around the world have been reconfiguring their economic policies in order to remain competitive in a global economy. In case you haven’t been paying attention, new middle classes have slowly emerged in such places as China, Belarus, Brazil, Russia, Vietnam, and amongst South African blacks. People in these countries now have spending power thereby causing a demand for products and services, not to mention a call for construction of new houses and businesses.
The rise of middle classes around the world is significant as it is a recognition that capitalism works as opposed to socialism or communism. A sizable middle class represents an economic engine for a country. Capitalism encourages people to work and to invest and spend their money and allows a country to collectively compete. The average person wants nothing more than to earn a respectable livelihood, so they can enjoy life and raise a family unencumbered by overbearing government regulations. As President Calvin Coolidge observed, “After all, the chief business of the American people is business. They are profoundly concerned with producing, buying, selling, investing and prospering in the world. I am strongly of the opinion that the great majority of people will always find these the moving impulses of our life.”
In order for capitalism to work, you need to be allowed to have certain freedoms, such as the freedom of expression, the freedom to innovate and invent, the freedom to choose your own path, the freedom to conduct legitimate business, etc. This is why it is rather ironic how some of our former communist foes are now embracing capitalism.
In the absence of a middle class, you have just the rich and the poor (the “have’s” and the “have not’s”) which lends itself to being a feudal state controlled by dictators or monarchies. Such a state does not operate harmoniously, corruption is rampant, and unrest is common. The “have not’s”, which is a sizable majority, have little to earn and spend. Consequently, the economy sputters and stagnates which our communist friends discovered the hard way.
As mentioned, in order for capitalism to work, certain freedoms have to be permitted to allow a person to work, earn, and save their money, not to have it redistributed to others by government decree. This means there is an explicit relationship between freedom and capitalism. Implicitly, it means capitalism requires a certain amount of democracy to allow the citizens to participate in how the government runs, which means capitalism cannot work under a dictatorship (see Cuba, Iran, North Korea, et al). As an aside, it is the middle class who elects government officials, not the upper or lower classes. The upper class may support politicians economically, but it is the middle class that casts the votes.
When someone asks me about my political leanings, I tell them I am an unabashed capitalist. This of course means I believe in liberty, and the right of the individual to lead a meaningful life, and I abhor any attempt by government to alter this or forcibly redistribute the wealth earned by the individual. I can understand government monitoring the legality of someone’s occupation, but aside from this they should not hinder a person’s right to earn a living.
Capitalism is our greatest export. It represents the seeds of freedom and economic prosperity. If it spreads, it could lead to world stability and peace which, of course, certain tyrants and crackpots openly reject. For example, Iraq will be an interesting experiment in capitalism. If Iraq succeeds, freedom and democracy will succeed, which is why Middle Eastern terrorists desperately want to see it fail as it represents a challenge to their authority. It’s not so much about religion as it is about control. Capitalism is a genuine threat to feudalism, a system which has no regards for the rights of the human-being and respect for the human spirit. Make no mistake, feudalism is barbaric.
To summarize:
1. In order to effectively compete in a world economy, you need capitalism.
2. In order for capitalism to flourish, you need freedom and democracy.
3. A byproduct of capitalism is a sizable middle class with spending power.
4. Therefore, any attempt to change capitalism is a threat to freedom, democracy, and the middle class.
No, I am not a proponent of government sponsored bailouts, stimulus packages or the creation of artificial jobs. Such devices does a disservice to capitalism and is unnatural. It is not government’s role to tamper with capitalism, only to establish the environment for capitalism to flourish, namely assuring freedom and democracy, serving its constituents, and providing incentives to encourage new avenues of business.
Yes, the failing financial companies and automotive manufacturers should have been closed. They were corrupt, made bad decisions based on greed and stupidity, and do not deserve any sympathy for their plight. If they had been allowed to fail, new institutions would have surely been created to replace them which would have been leaner, stronger and smarter. It’s called “evolution.” By bringing back our right to fail, you assure our right to succeed.
Originally published: August 4, 2010
Keep the Faith!
Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.
Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at timb001@phmainstreet.com
For Tim’s columns, see: timbryce.com
Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.
Copyright © 2015 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.
NEXT UP: THE FINAL ROUNDUP – What I learned during the years I spent on the Board of Directors for nonprofit organizations.
LAST TIME: PROTECTING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – Copyrights, trade secrets, patents, trade marks, and other things that go bump in the night.
Listen to Tim on WJTN-AM (News Talk 1240) “The Town Square” with host John Siggins (Mon, Wed, Fri, 12:30-3:00pm Eastern); WZIG-FM (104.1) in Palm Harbor,FL; and KIT-AM 1280 in Yakima, Washington “The Morning News” with hosts Dave Ettl & Lance Tormey (weekdays. 6:00-9:00am Pacific). Or tune-in to Tim’s channel on YouTube.
Wayne Brown said
This handful of points is exactly what has not been taught to our children in public schools for decades now. As a result we have younger generations who find promise in the lies of socialism and have not fear of communism. In fact, they see it as a haven where none of the “greed and ugliness” of capitalism reside–the government controls the total environment. At the same time, in their calls for raising the minimum wage and working less hours, they fail to realize that the USA has a product which creates much of the magic of our environment–it’s called “productivity”. There is no nation on earth with low productivity and high living standards. Those nations that have embraced such a concept soon find their GDP fallings, debt piling up, and a population filled with the “constant vacationer”. The premise of Marx’s belief that mankind is drawn to work and will work regardless of pay is the primary flaw in all the other conclusions regarding socialism. Socialism equals low productivity and low productivity yields failure across the board. This is a lesson hard learned by many in the world today and sadly the people of the USA may be the last to learn it. Good write! ~ WB
LikeLiked by 2 people
Tim Bryce said
An S.M. of Mountain Home, Idaho wrote…
“The middle class makes freedom successful. It’s ironic (and double talk) when Hillary talks about advancing the middle class when in reality the proposals of the Democrats advance feudalism, and squash the middle class.”
LikeLike
Tim Bryce said
An M.B. of Wilmington, North Carolina wrote…
“Without the middle class all forms of government fail.”
LikeLike
Tim Bryce said
A D.M. of Ottawa, Ontario wrote…
“One wonders… if you look back… many revolutionary control regimes came from the actions of the elite sections of society; but weren’t the inspirations for the US revolution from a far more middle and lower income strata? Indeed, the Fathers were often wealthy landowners, but those who developed the philosophy and thought discipline for the Enlightenment realization of a Republic founded on Liberty… were they not of more (un)common stock?”
LikeLike
THE FINAL ROUNDUP « THE BRYCE IS RIGHT! said
[…] WHY WE NEED A MIDDLE CLASS […]
LikeLike