Software for the finest computer – The Mind


Posted by Tim Bryce on February 29, 2016


– Another indicator of the fragile state of our economy.

To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

Normally, when you want to analyze the state of our economy, you examine such things as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which is currently at a paltry annual rate of 0.7%. Or you might consider unemployment which, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics is at 5%. This, of course, does not include people who have stopped looking for work over the past four weeks, thereby bringing the real unemployment rate up to 9.9% (according to Gallup).

However, the Gallup organization recently produced a new report about corporate acquisitions corporate acquisitions which reveals some unsettling numbers affecting the economy. In a nutshell, Gallup discovered companies are frustrated by an economy inhibiting them from growing from within, preferring instead to acquire competitive companies.

In studying the Forbes Global 2000 (G2000) companies, Gallup discovered the number of publicly traded companies have been cut in half over the past twenty years, going from approximately 7,300 to 3,700. As the company correctly points out, “In a perfect world, the market would have doubled the number of big public companies instead of halving it.”

However, getting companies to improve internally has become a serious challenge. As Gallup explains it, 71% of workers have become indifferent about their companies and have actively disengaged from them. This means only a handful of employees find meaning in their work and are industrious.

The question is, why have so many people become disengaged at work? In large part, blame can be placed on management’s inclination to micromanage everything in an office, thereby creating a master/slave mentality which is hardly conducive for encouraging workers to assume responsibility, take charge, and become engaged in the business of the company. As I’ve mentioned on many occasions, I am more of a believer in managing from the bottom-up, meaning you should train your people properly, empower them to execute project assignments on their own, and get out of their way. Of course, managers should monitor project status and run interference on problems as required, thereby allowing the workers to focus on their responsibilities. Such an approach encourages workers to take ownership of their projects and create an esprit de corps. In other words, managers should manage more and supervise less.

By simply “managing from the bottom-up,” companies can engage their workers, thereby providing them with the ability to improve from within, and deter the need to acquire other companies. Besides, how do we know these other companies are any better than our own?

Related article:
“Are You Engaged in Work?” (Nov 11, 2013)

Also published with News Talk Florida.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at

For Tim’s columns, see:

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2016 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

NEXT UP:  AT HOME WITH THE MILLENNIALS – Why are so many staying home?


Listen to Tim on WJTN-AM (News Talk 1240) “The Town Square” with host John Siggins (Mon, Wed, Fri, 12:30-3:00pm Eastern); WZIG-FM (104.1) in Palm Harbor,FL; KIT-AM (1280) in Yakima, Washington “The Morning News” with hosts Dave Ettl & Lance Tormey (weekdays. 6:00-9:00am Pacific); and WWBA-AM (News Talk Florida 820). Or tune-in to Tim’s channel on YouTube.


3 Responses to “ACQUISITIONS: A BAD SIGN?”

  1. Tim Bryce said

    An M.B. of Wilmington, North Carolina wrote…

    “Tim, good article. Acquisitions are always an interesting area to analyze particularly when they are low indicating a super sluggish economy. Buying competitors has always been a strategy as has purchasing new technology or products to expand. My son in law specializes in mergers and acquisitions areas as a lawyer so I am sending the link for this article to him to get his read on it.”


  2. Tim Bryce said

    A W.H. of Boulder, Colorado wrote…

    “A LONG time ago, back when my wife was alive and a practicing software programming contractor, we used a CPA (in Maryland) to do our taxes and financial planning to deal with her income.

    He told me (back in the 80’s) that when WE bought stock as individuals, we had to pay capital gains at that exorbitant rate then, AND obviously we had to use AFTER TAX dollars to buy that stock. And, then you’re also dealing with the marginal tax rate for the rest of your income that comes into play.

    BUT, if you were a corporation, you could invest up to like $100,000 per year in stock of another DOMESTIC corporation BEFORE TAXES. Plus, their capital gains taxes were like 15% or less, and they could take the profits out and put into retained earnings of the corporation without tax penalty.

    IF this treatment is still in effect, it could explain easily WHY corporations want to buy other corporations – it’s a sweetheart deal financially. Obviously, the bigger the company and the bigger the acquisition, the more they need lawyers and CPA’s to make sure they get the best benefit tax-wise from the deal. But, that’s why they have both lawyers and CPA’s on retainer/staff.”




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: