Software for the finest computer – The Mind


Posted by Tim Bryce on February 9, 2018


– Can an old dog learn new tricks?

To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

Freemasons have always been proud to boast, “We’re the original fraternity,” an acknowledgement of our roots in antiquity. Since then, many other fraternities have emerged, particularly in the nineteenth century, many of which are based on Masonic customs. Aside from college fraternities, there are the Eagles, the Elks, the Lions, the Moose, the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), even the VFW shows signs of fraternal relations. These organizations may appear to be relative “upstarts” when compared to our ancient fraternity, but can they teach us anything?

As in many North America jurisdictions, Florida Freemasons are barred from enjoying alcohol in the Lodge as well as games of chance. Whenever such topics arise at a Grand Communications, the proposer is shouted down and admonished in a derogatory manner, “Why don’t you go and join someone else?” Well, I finally did just that, joined another fraternal order who allowed alcohol and games of chance in the Lodge. The identity of this particular order is immaterial for the purposes of this paper, and I suspect most are pretty much the same. I certainly haven’t turned my back on Freemasonry, but after over twenty years of watching repetition, I felt it was time to relax and enjoy the company of others over a quiet drink.

I joined the new “Order” recently as they had built a new lodge building near me and I was warmly received by the members when I requested information. As I first toured the facilities, I noted their clean and well stocked bar offering a wide variety of drinks and twelve taps for various draught beers. There were also some vending games of chance available if a member was so inclined. When I saw this, I thought back to a time when Masons argued over the virtues of alcohol and games in Lodge and why there was a concerted effort to prohibit it. Personally, I suspected the Shrine didn’t want the Craft Lodges to have it as it would represent a competitor to their venue. Nevertheless…

I found the Order’s dues and initiation fees to be affordable, much more so than any Masonic Lodge in my area. This was likely due to the revenues generated from alcohol, games, and renting of facilities. In other words, membership in the Order was not a financial burden as found in many Masonic Lodges today.

The application process and initiation ceremony were highly compatible to that found in Freemasonry. This led me to suspect such orders are based on Freemasonry as the comparisons were uncanny. For example, on the Order’s application, they claimed to be looking for men (and women) of good moral character; you couldn’t join unless you believed in the existence of a Supreme Being, were of 21 years of age or older, not connected in any way to the Communist Party, did not believe in or advocate the overthrow of the government of this country by force or violence, nor was a convicted felon or registered sex offender. A criminal background check is performed on each candidate, who is also investigated by committee. Sound familiar?

The Order also donates millions of dollars to charity, a living community village (Home) is available for seniors, all of which are also familiar to Freemasons. Beyond this though, the Order offers discounts on insurance, travel, office supplies, and more. In other words, membership has its privileges. The Order is open to both men and women, which would be alarming to most Masons, and there are no racial restrictions; e.g., no “Prince” Orders.

The first year’s membership is free for members of the military, law enforcement, and first responders, both current and retired (veterans). I thought this was a brilliant maneuver as it encourages membership and attracts the type of people they want to join their ranks. Freemasonry would be wise to study this further.

In meetings, the Order has jewels for the officers to wear. There are also do-guards and signs to observe. The obligation (oath) is reminiscent of that offered by Freemasonry along with a brief lecture to explain member responsibilities. Interestingly, I observed our initiation could be viewed by the outside world through the windows in the room. So much for being a “secret” society.

Perhaps the biggest difference between the Order and Freemasonry resides in its Constitution, a copy of which is provided to members following initiation. Whereas Freemasonry is managed on a state by state basis (or by province or territory in Canada), the Order is run on an international basis from a single headquarters. This simplifies standards and promotes consistency between Lodges. It also means the government of the Order is flatter and more flexible to implement change.

Grand Masonic Lodges were first established in the early 1700’s, way before the advent of the U.S. Constitution. Consequently, the government of the fraternity is essentially based on the monarchy model. However, as these other orders were introduced in the United States during the late 1800’s, they tend to adhere to the concept of three separate but equal branches of government; e.g., executive, legislative, and judicial. Such an approach prohibits one person from having ultimate authority in interpreting the laws, rules and regulations which may vary depending on who is in office. It also causes a legislative body to be formed from the current and past presidents of the Orders.


I am certainly not suggesting one fraternal group is better than another; each has its own distinct set of interests and method of implementation. However, one could certainly learn from the others. For example, what the Order lacks in terms of decorum, they make up for in socialization. Conversely, what Freemasons lack in socialization, they make up for in decorum. Freemasons possess a stronger sense of history, and attention to detail in its ceremonies, thereby attempting to teach character, e.g., morality, love of God and country, honor, sacrifice, etc. By doing so they are trying to assist their members in the building of character. The other orders are much less formal, but still endeavor to promote character and Brotherhood through the help and society of others.

In contrast, the Order has been successful in:

– Generating money from alcoholic libations with no adverse effects (swearing, fighting and intemperance are not tolerated and may result in penalties or suspensions for members). Further, rooms can be rented for parties and special events.

– Negotiating benefits for its members, such as providing discounts on insurance, travel, office supplies, etc.

– Attracting new members with the type of character they desire, both men and women.

One could argue Freemasonry has slowly been evolving from a true fraternity to just another men’s club. They may be more solemn in their ceremonies, but surely they are not naive to believe they have a monopoly on the concept of brotherhood.

When I recently joined the Order, my initiation class consisted of 22 people, including both men and women, which is more than double what a single Masonic Lodge in my area may get in a single year. Two weeks earlier, another 22 people were initiated, and 60 people joined in December. Not surprising, the Order is financially sound, their activities are booming, their future looks rosy, and everyone appears to be happy.

Freemasonry is missing the boat if they dismiss the other orders out of hand. They are gaining in stature while the Masons are declining. I am not suggesting the Masons totally abdicate their current mission, but there is no denying their membership has been diminishing at an alarming rate. Something needs to change before the Lodges close their doors permanently. Perhaps a new hybrid organization needs to be conceived, whereby alcohol and games of chance are allowed following a meeting or degree, that the Grand Lodge seeks supplemental benefits for its membership, or that they also try to attract the right types of people to their organization. If the other orders can do it, why not the Masons?

Freemasonry may be much older, but these younger fraternities have grown up and appear to be prospering. What do they know that we do not? I for one, am not too shy to ask. In the meantime, more people are gravitating to these new orders while turning their backs on Freemasonry. Perhaps this is a sign of our changing social values. Let us not close our eyes, ears, and mouths and hope nobody notices. It’s much too late for that.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 40 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at

For Tim’s columns, see:

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2018 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.


Listen to Tim on WZIG-FM (104.1) in Palm Harbor,FL; Or tune-in to Tim’s channel on YouTube. Click for TIM’S LIBRARY OF AUDIO CLIPS.




  1. Tim Bryce said

    A U.V. of Largo, Florida wrote…

    “Good one. Worth thinking about. I’m thinking about quitting the Eastern Star. They turned me off a long time ago, but I held on because I knew they were losing members and needed the dues to survive. But I don’t drive at night any more and the meetings were boring. A chance for old women to dress up and feel important. What surprised me in the beginning was every issue was settled before the meeting even started. So what were we convening for? I volunteered to help in the kitchen so I could slip out of the meeting early and set up for coffee and refreshments after the meeting which also let me off the hook with cleaning up. And I got to go home early. I’m is no fool, but maybe I am for still being a member.”


  2. Larry Miglore said


    Right on the nail head!  Will Masonry change? Come on…

    What the other order?  I’ll guess the Elks.

    Larry & Joanne Miglore …….back home in Algonquin, IL 73 de KB9DIP, AF&AM, AASR, AANOMS


  3. Tim Bryce said

    A W.H. of Boulder, Colorado wrote…

    “The prohibition on drinking stems from our past history as a nation in the prohibition era. Sort of like the Puritanical ethos we inherited from the pilgrims on the Mayflower that we just haven’t seemed to shake. European countries are less concerned about exposed body parts than we are and they don’t seem to be having any more issues between the sexes (if anything, they have fewer problems). Likewise, when I was in Scotland, while the LODGE itself did not have alcohol inside, there was a pub next door. After all, for you to serve alcohol, you have to be licensed, bonded, and insured – all of which is a cost of doing business. And, many lodges today would not want the responsibility of serving alcohol and then being responsible if one of the patrons had an accident driving under the influence. But, that’s a training thing. Gambling? Well, isn’t it interesting that a number of our “concordant” bodies (OES, Amaranth, etc) all sponsor bus trips to casinos (at least here in Colorado) as a fundraiser? The people that go ride on the bus, spend the day at the casino, eat a meal, and come home. I think it typically costs like $20 for them to ride the bus, and they get “x” tokens to spend. Of course, the casino is betting on you spending more money, and the buffets are usually cheap “loss leaders” because they figure you are going to get hungry, and they don’t want you to leave the casino looking for food, because you might not come back.

    All this is a PERSONAL decision, and yes, both drinking and gambling CAN be addictive behaviors – sometimes destructively so. Perhaps it is our inherent reluctance to confront a brother who has crossed any of those lines and is not paying attention to his own ashlar?

    No one wants to be the “bad guy” and toss a guy out when he’s had too much to drink – or take his keys from him – or give him a ride home. Yet, we would do the same thing for a neighbor, or our own kids if they found themselves out and in a situation that was dangerous. Hmmm.

    My National Sojourners chapter USED to meet at the Denver Elks club routinely – for many years. Eventually they closed up the lunch food service, which caused us to look for someplace else to meet. They also had a bar where you could get a drink if you wished. They also had minor slots and other legal gambling devices. They even had some of the local Denver Sheriff’s Department deputies that would come in for lunch on occasion. It was a well-kept, albeit old, building that served its purpose well. We never got charged for using that facility – they figured they were making money off the drinks and food anyway, and no one else wanted the area where we met when we met – so it was a mutually beneficial arrangement for us both. We were sad to see that one go.

    And, in today’s environment, I can tell you that in 1989 when I first arrived in Boulder, my wife and I looked at becoming a “social member” of the Boulder Golf Club (I don’t play golf) because we missed having an officer’s club nearby and wanted something like that as a place to go (back then, there were good restaurants in Boulder, but today the choices are overwhelming). Anyway, we went to check out the place. Had a nice lunch at a reasonable price, but when they told us there was a 4 year wait to join as a social member (10 year as a golf member) – and the joining fee was $10,000.00 for social and $40,000 for golf – I figured maybe that might be just a little too rich for my pocketbook and declined to apply for membership. Oh, and after you were a member, you had annual dues, and you also had to guarantee a minimum of $150

    Nicely done. I doubt seriously that any GL will change those rules (and don’t you think it strange that Nevada might well prohibit alcohol/gambling in lodge despite the fact that those are two of the three primary business areas in the state. The other involving sex, but that’s another story altogether.”


  4. Tim Bryce said

    A J.T. of Palm Harbor, Florida wrote…

    Excellent! All of the old timers really need to hear this, plus all of grand Lodge past and present. If they do not change like you said it will die! It’s heading there now!

    Again well done.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: