Software for the finest computer – The Mind

Posts Tagged ‘Pinellas County’


Posted by Tim Bryce on September 28, 2017


– There is a question of whether it addresses the true problems of the county.

To use this segment in a Radio broadcast or Podcast, send TIM a request.

The November 7th referendum to renew the “Pennies for Pinellas” tax is not a slam dunk. The Pinellas County Commissioners would have us believe it is a done deal. Not so fast. There is a lack of accountability in the wording which will not address the problems of Pinellas County effectively. To illustrate:

Pinellas voters will remember the 200 million gallons of sewage St. Petersburg discharged into local neighborhoods and waterways in 2015 and 2016, along with other spills throughout Pinellas County. Some might believe the County corrected the problem since then. In reality, No, it did not, as proven by Hurricane Irma. Most residents are unaware sewage problems erupted during the storm. Throughout the county, 33 spills were reported to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) totaling millions of gallons. According to the Department, Clearwater alone experienced sewage spills of just under two million gallons, and St. Petersburg just under 500,000 gallons during this period. Sewage spills are common when inundated with water, but this was after only 3.67 inches of rain and low tides, a scenario that should have been easily accommodated.

The point is, in terms of Pinellas County’s sewage problems, we’re far from being out of the woods.

Coupled with this is the county’s electrical grid which also failed during Irma. Over 100,000 Duke Energy customers in Pinellas lost power, some for up to a week or more. Fallen trees were often the culprit. Workers eventually restored power replacing some 3,000 poles and many transformers, but did nothing to assure such an outage occurs again. This is like putting several fingers in a dike, when the dike itself should be rebuilt. Perhaps burying power lines is the answer, and perhaps other alternatives. The fact remains, what we have in place today is fragile and prone to failure from high winds and even moderate rain, both indigenous to our county. What is necessary is to look at the problem from 50,000 feet and formulate a new alternative.

Enter the “Pennies for Pinellas” referendum which will renew the sales tax for another ten years. If you will recall, the “Pennies” tax was initially created in 1990 to support infrastructure needs, such as the Bayside Bridge. Since its creation, it has been used for other pet projects of the Pinellas Planning Department, such as parks and recreation and other projects, including emergency and law enforcement vehicles. Interestingly, most other counties do not have a “Pennies” tax, yet seem to find ways to pay for such vehicles.

If passed, the referendum will result in a whooping $2 billion over ten years. However, the language used on the ballot is such that if it passes, the Planning Department is free to spend it anyway they want, not by what is critically needed. The question on the November 7th ballot reads as follows:

County Referendum Question-
Ten (10) Year Extension of the Penny for Pinellas One-Cent (1¢) Infrastructure Sales Surtax – Shall the levy of the Penny for Pinellas one-cent (1¢) local infrastructure sales surtax be extended for an additional ten (10) years to finance county and municipal projects, including roads, bridges, flood and sewer spill prevention, water quality, trails, parks, environmental preservation, public safety facilities, hurricane sheltering, vehicles, technology, land acquisition for affordable housing, capital projects supporting economic development (pursuant to section 212.055(2)(d)3, Florida Statutes), and other authorized infrastructure projects.

According to Barb Haselden, candidate for County Commissioner in District 6 (northern St. Pete, from Gulf to Bay), “This would be giving the county commission a blank check for $2 Billion Dollars!” She believes the wording is too vague and doesn’t focus on such things as the county’s sewage, storm water and electrical problems, areas she is committed to addressing.

There is one big problem though, it is too late to change the wording on the ballot, which will start being mailed out to absentee voters beginning in early October. Haselden’s advice, “Just say NO to the referendum.” Correct the verbiage and vote on it again next year.

Those who want to see the “Pennies” referendum pass are counting on a naive public who will be apathetic in terms of voting in an off year. Whereas heavy voter turnout will likely defeat the referendum, a light turnout will assure its passage. In other words, someone is trying to pull a fast one on unsuspecting voters in Pinellas County.

The “Pennies for Pinellas” referendum is the only question that will appear uniformly on all ballots in the County. This highlights the fact, this is not just a St. Petersburg problem, but one that is county wide, and why it is important for all Pinellas County voters to get out the vote, be it north, south, east, or west.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 40 years of experience in the management consulting field. He can be reached at

For Tim’s columns, see:

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2017 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

Also read Tim’s columns in the THE HUFFINGTON POST

NEXT UP:  INTUITIVENESS, THE SIXTH SENSE – Some recognition for the Radar O’Reillys of the world.

LAST TIME:  WHY WE LISTEN TO RUSH & COMPANY  – Maybe because they are “right”?

Listen to Tim on WZIG-FM (104.1) in Palm Harbor,FL; KIT-AM (1280) in Yakima, Washington “The Morning News” with hosts Dave Ettl & Lance Tormey (weekdays. 6:00-9:00am Pacific). Or tune-in to Tim’s channel on YouTube. Click for TIM’S LIBRARY OF AUDIO CLIPS.



Posted in Politics | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »


Posted by Tim Bryce on October 3, 2013


As Pinellas residents, we are fairly cognizant of the importance of managing water, be it from the Gulf, our aquifer, reclaimed, or from the skies. Storm water is of particular concern to us as we often experience torrential downpours or the occasional hurricane. Over the years we have developed rules and regulations to control flooding, such as the need for retention ponds and finding ways to dispose of excess water to the Gulf. This has greatly reduced flash flooding in Pinellas, but not all of our county was developed according to the rules, particularly older sections where flash flooding is still a serious threat to many communities.

The management of storm water falls under the jurisdiction of the Pinellas County Public Works, specifically the department of Engineering & Environmental Services (E&ES). In addition to drainage, they are also concerned with the improvement of water quality through the reduction of pollutants to downstream receiving waters. The clean up of our lakes and ponds are driven in accordance with EPA regulations which can be a costly proposition.

I recently met with County Commissioner Susan Latvala who is not only concerned about controlling flooding, but how we are to pay for it. According to Latvala, a Surface Water Assessment is going into effect October 1st which taxpayers will find in their Real Estate taxes and based on their impervious surface square footage. According to the County’s website, impervious surface refers to a “hard surface that does not absorb water, like parking lots and buildings. Impervious areas increase the amount of storm water runoff, which is the cause of much of our flooding and pollution problems.”

The County Commissioners anticipate this will generate $16.2 Million in FY14 to pay for storm water management and cleaning up our lakes and ponds (with a little bit coming from “Pennies for Pinellas”).

To calculate the square footage, the county will make use of records from the Property Appraiser’s Office, along with aerial photography. However, homeowners may question how their assessment is calculated and request an adjustment if they believe it is incorrect. To do so, they must submit requests by October 10th.

Applicants will be considered on a case-by-case basis and, according to the county’s instructions, “The applicant will need to demonstrate any unique features on their property to reduce the storm water impact to the County’s system either with a licensed engineer, or provide as-built plans, surveys or other supporting documentation.” Depending on how much the homeowner is assessed, it may very well be worthwhile to do so.

The “Pinellas County Surface Water Utility Adjustments and Credits Policies and Procedures Manual,” which explains how to apply for an adjustment.

Taxpayers may not be happy with the bump in their taxes, but as Latvala points out, “This is something we should have done forty years ago as flooding and water quality is a very serious problem in our county.”

Personally, I remember the building codes back in the 1980’s when we constructed our first office. This resulted in retention ponds on our property which saved us on more than one occasion. As a past president of a homeowners association in Palm Harbor, I am also very familiar with how flood waters are to be removed, involving some rather clever Civil Engineering. It is no small task, but I greatly appreciate the need for it.

In the 28 years I’ve lived here, there has been a lot of progress made in managing storm water. The fact remains though, we still have a way to go until we get all of Pinellas under control.

Keep the Faith!

Note: All trademarks both marked and unmarked belong to their respective companies.

Tim Bryce is a writer and the Managing Director of M&JB Investment Company (M&JB) of Palm Harbor, Florida and has over 30 years of experience in the management consulting field. He is also a contributing columnist for the Saint Petersburg Tribune. He can be reached at

For Tim’s columns, see:

Like the article? TELL A FRIEND.

Copyright © 2013 by Tim Bryce. All rights reserved.

Posted in Pinellas County | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

%d bloggers like this: